This is a mirror of official site: http://jasper-net.blogspot.com/

Tying Mono and OpenCL

| Wednesday, June 23, 2010
  One of the cool buzzword these days beside parallel computing is GPGPU as in General Purpose GPU.
The base idea of GPGPU is to allow a programmer to tape in the parallel processing capacities of a GPU to do something different than pixel crushing (even though it mostly boils down to that very application most of time).
  GPGPU isn’t new and for a long time vendors have provided their own rather low-level toolkit to program arbitrarily a GPU. As often, someone stepped up one day and proposed a unified API on top of all the vendor specificities. In our case, that API is a standard defined by the Khronos group (think OpenGL) and is named OpenCL.
OpenCL defines both a high-level C API to manipulate GPU (plus other friends) and a C-like intermediate language that is compiled and ultimately run on the device. It’s actually the same model as shader programming.
   In the pursuit of Mono world-domination and following the implementation of PLinq that strived to be an easy way for programmer to access the multicore architecture of our processors via Linq, I hereby introduce GLinq (unoriginal acronym for GPU Linq) which this time use your graphic card to execute Linq queries via OpenCL.
  GLinq is still much in its infancy and currently only support the Linq’s Select operator but I hope to be able to implement several other operators (at least the classic Where-Aggregate combo). The end goal is also to provide a new set of operator to allow OpenGL code to access the results of the computation without doing a roundtrip between CPU and GPU.
  As I said previously, GLinq has the same design goal as PLinq which was to provide a totally new execution model for programmer in the most transparent way possible and with little modification to existing code. In our case, this prerequisite is rather tricky since you are juggling between two totally different worlds.

Read more: Yet Another [À Compléter]

Posted via email from .NET Info

0 comments: